IS THERE SUCH A THING AS ISLAMIC RISK MANAGEMENT?
I had this conversation recently until the wee hours of morning, and although I never thought a lot about it, I have come to the conclusion that there cannot be an exact replica of the Risk Management in the conventional sense.
Risk Management is a tool used by all conventional banking institution in the name of good governance, risk mitigation and prudent practice. It looks at financial exposures and its inherent risks to the business, and deeply believe in the risk-rewards pay-off within the generally accepted risk appetite of the organisation. It focuses a lot on control processes, performance monitoring, collateral value, and decision making policies for credit, market and systemic risks.
To a large extend, the risk management framework employed by the conventional banking businesses can be easily adapted by Islamic Banking counterparts. The components are the same, and there is little argument on its applicability under Shariah law. However, the risk management framework for Islamic Banking institutions must be inherently different as well, or maybe extended to include a bigger scope. It cannot just be seen as a replica of the conventional business; the foundation of Islamic Banking is definitely different.
There are a few divergence in the reason an Islamic Banking institutions should (ideally) follow. This is an on-going argument on the fact while Islamic Banking claims to be a different business model, but it is still engineered by the rules of a conventional organisation. But what are these divergent reasons for setting up an Islamic Banking business?
The lending of money to make money is forbidden.
This may seem like a trivial thing for Islamic Banking as many will say there is no difference between profit and interest. But for us practitioners, there is a big difference in its concept. Because of this difference, the way we think about how a product can be structured is paramount. Underlying contracts, assets, ownerships and roles and responsibilities becomes different from a tranditional / conventional bank (whom are essentially a money lender). To validate a transaction, all tenets and requirements in an Islamic contracts must be met or else it becomes an invalid transaction and any gains from it must be given to charity. Any gains obtained without fulfilling the transactional can be deemed as usury (riba’).
There are specific Shariah requirements that takes Islamic Banking beyond banking.
Some terms are pretty alien to traditional banks, such as commodity purchase, operating lease and rentals, sequencing and ownerships. This is where the divergent begins, because Islamic Banks espouses the concept of “trading” and “entrepreneurship” and “partnership” and “service provider”, away from the “lender-borrower” arrangement. Traditional banks struggle to understand issues of ownership of assets, risk and loss sharing, purchases of commodity and rental of assets. These activities are beyond traditional banking, and may become an operational risk issue if it is not fully embraced.
Islamic Banking should be more closer to a venture-capitalist, crowd-funding model than traditional banking.
The fundamental requirements for earning a profit (and to a bigger extent, how much we can earn from a transaction) is the element of risk sharing, which mean both customer and financier takes some form of the risks of the venture. At the same time, such “risky” venture is mitigated by way of ensuring it is not overstretched i.e. the transactions must be either asset-backed (including the presence of collaterals) or asset-based (evidenced by real trading or assets or commodities) to reflect economic activity.
The amount of risk taken under an Islamic contract can be higher (for contracts such as Mudharabah or Musyaraka financing) but it must be reflective of the economic reality and available assets.
The risk assessment of an Islamic contract must then be enhanced to behave similarly to what a venture capitalist can accept. There will be direct risks on equity, investments and returns. There will be corresponding returns as well. But such concepts will be difficult to digest if the bank is set up based on traditional banking fundamentals, which caters for a totally different profile of stakeholders.
As far as possible, the Shariah committee draws a line for transparency, fairness, and justice.
Islamic Banking should be an extended but integral part of economics. Islamic Banking is supposed to be more than a bank. It shoulders a broader responsibility to the people by looking at needs and providing products that serve a purpose. The idea of responsible financing, transparency and customer service should be the by-word of an Islamic Bank. The payment of Zakat (tithe) on profits which goes back into the community recognises the financial role that it needs to play. Corporate Social Responsibilities also play a role.
In this repect, the Shariah committee plays an important role as gatekeepers to the products and services on offer. Because of the unfamiliar territory of Islamic products, Shariah insists that transparency is critical to avoid uncertainty (gharar), the terms to the products are fair and the banks are ethical in its conduct to ensure justice. Fees and charges must reflect actual costs. Efforts are made to help a customer in distress. And conduct of the bank must comply with the requirements of Shariah.
SO, BASED ON THE ABOVE, WHAT ARE THE OF RISKS FACED BY ISLAMIC BANKS?
As a general rule, all risks faced by a conventional Bank must be “transferable” i.e the nature of the financial transaction must, as far as possible, allow for the TRANSFER OF RISKS. Wherever the opportunity arises, the Bank must be able to quickly pass the risk of the asset or valuation to the customer. Such understanding is also apparent in Islamic Banks. Looking at most Islamic Banking contracts, their structure allows for the transfer of risks, which follows the transfers of ownership, responsibilities and obligations from one party to the other. Contracts such as Murabahah, Musawamah and Qard works by transferring the ownership, responsibilities and obligation from the Bank to the Customer.
Alternatively, mostly exclusive to Islamic Banks, are structures that allows for SHARING OF RISKS. The structure is more “participative” in nature, where there are benchmark by which determines the level of risks a party should have. The regular types of contracts that continues to share risks are Mudarabah, Musyarakah and Ijarah.
As mentioned before, the risks faced by a conventional bank and Islamic Bank should be very much the same, except for risks arising to the execution of Islamic contracts or pronouncement of the Shariah. While there will be common elements of risks for both types of Banks, the importance of Shariah ruling and decisions result in Islamic Banking becoming so unique. The following are the Risks commonly faced by Islamic Banks:
GENERAL RISKS – Risks existing in both conventional and Islamic banks.
- Credit Risks – Arises due to counterparty risks (possibility of default by the party taking financing) where the counterparty fails to meet its obligations, in terms of payment, uncertainty of industry, change of direction or diminished collateral value. This lead to settlement risks which means the Asset quality has diminished.
- Market Risks / Interest Rate Risks – More macro in terms of effect on the risks. It relies on the performance of the market as well as the quality of the financial instruments (price, performance, valuation, demand, yields and inability to reprice. It leads to exposure to interest rate risks, where the risk of the bank increases with movements in the rates.
- Liquidity Risks – Refers to the risk of inability to return cash to investors or stakeholder in stressed scenarios, resulting in forced borrowings from the market (usually at higher price) coupled with the possibility of not able to dispose assets. This may lead to valuation risks.
- Operational Risks – Due to inadequate control of internal processes and operational practices, the risks may result in real loss of income and potentially reputation. Human errors may be difficult to unwind especially if there is financial implications. There may also be legal risks as it may be considered a breach in contract by the bank.
ISLAMIC SPECIFIC RISKS – Risks arising from operational and processing function
- Transactional risks – Especially under Islamic Banking structures, transactions play an important role as part of the Aqad, where required. For example, the sequencing of a Murabahah transaction. Failure to ensure compliance to the Aqad requirements will lead to potential invalid transaction and loss of income (or flow to charity).
- Valuation Risks – Due to the nature of some Islamic Banking contracts, especially equity based structures, there will be challenges in valuation of the portfolio. Reduction in valuation will result in real losses for the investors.
- Displaced Commercial Risks – Displaced Commercial Risk (DCR) refer to the risk of mismatch between the fixed/contracted obligation to the depositors vs the uncertain returns on the financing (income) which may result in the income is insufficient to meet the obligations to the depositors. For example, the commitment for Islamic Fixed Deposit is 4% (contractual) but the Financing portfolio into which the Fixed Deposits is deployed into only earns 3% (actual returns). Therefore, the 1% shortage is the DCR where the Bank will have to flow 1% of income from other portfolio to meet the deposit obligation of 4%.
SHARIAH RISKS – Risks arising to non-compliance of Shariah decisions and Shariah instructions.
- Shariah Compliance Risks – The operation of an Islamic Bank is hugely dependent on the requirements of the Shariah Committee and approvals obtain on the process and procedure. Inability to comply with Shariah requirements puts the operations of the Islamic bank at risk as the department may be regarded as non-Shariah compliant business.
- Fiduciary / Ownership Risks – Some of the structures under Islamic contract requires the bank to operate outside the scope of a financial intermediary. It requires the bank to hold property or trade commodities or own and lease assets, with various contracts using various roles and responsibilities. The risk of multiple roles and function must be clearly defined and implemented.
- Regulatory / Reputational Risks – Changes in regulations requires quick adaptation to ensure compliance to regulation and maintaining the banking reputation intact.?
SO HOW DO YOU MANAGE ISLAMIC RISKS AND SHARIAH RISKS
As mentioned, Islamic management of risks should not be any different for the base of conventional bank’s methodology of measuring risks. There must be deep understanding of the products and structure for the bank to be able to assess the risks associated. To manage an Islamic Bank and its risks, the bank must first identify each of the risks and form safeguards to settle the above. Then only an Islamic bank can formulate suitable controls to ensure the Shariah specific processes and Shariah pronouncements are being monitored and implemented with sufficient support (internal or external). Wallahualam.
Salam En .Amir,
Nice articles. Just one thought here, is ijarah consider as risk sharing?
In general, risks sharing is defined as arrangement where all parties share some form of the risks; either both parties hold the financial or valuation risks, or one party holding financial risks and the other holding other risks such as default, interest rate or market risks.
My view is that if the arrangement protects one party but not the other, then it is a risk transfer structure and you see this in debt-based contracts.
However, when we talk about equity-based structure, both parties carries the performance risk ie risk sharing. Equity-based should include investment products, as well as financing based on Mudarabah and Wakalah bi al Isthihmar and Musyarakah.
But I would also like to extend it to pure Ijara and Istisna where the Bank MUST hold the risk of the asset until delivery or maturity. This is mitigated by having undertaking letters but the fact is, the default, ownership and valuation risks are held by the bank.
thanks En Amir.
assalamulaikum, im a student in malaysia and i am very interested in choosing risk management in islamic bank as my research topic. however, i find it very difficult to get the data for underwriting risk, credit risk and liquidity risk from year to year. is there a way i can get those data?
Hi Nur. I personally don’t think there is a specific body of data that handles Islamic risks. Essentially, Islamic risks and conventional risks are the same especially if the Islamic products offered are debt based. The additional risks however are Shariah risks which is a subset of operational risks. Unless you are offering equity based structures (where theres equity and market risks) then the risk should be the same.
salam, is there any way for me to get the data of underwriting risk, credit risk and liquidity risk from year to year? I am doing a research on this topic but i seem to not found any data on the risk.
Hi Ainxara. I personally don’t think there is a specific body of data that handles Islamic risks. Essentially, Islamic risks and conventional risks are the same especially if the Islamic products offered are debt based. The additional risks however are Shariah risks which is a subset of operational risks. Unless you are offering equity based structures (where theres equity and market risks) then the risk should be the same.
Assalamualaikum, i have a favor to ask, can you explain about risk management institution in islamic finance in malaysia. thank you in advance
In general, for an Islamic Bank operating based on debt-structures, the risk management is the same as a conventional bank’s risk management, except on the Shariah risks.
No doubt the Islamic financing system is different from conventional and observes a dual double role: religious and market orient than why most of Islamic Countries have not yet adopted this virtuous system.
Not all business entity welcomes Islamic financing system as a counterpart, but they see as a competitor. The conventional bank in Islamic countries have good returns and will protect their market share. Additionally, even Shariah scholars may have different opinion on what Islamic banking is all about or may have various suspicions on Islamic banking. This becomes a problem because there is no consensus on what the system can or should do.